Source 1 - http://ergo.slv.vic.gov.au/node/430
Three years after the Australian soldiers returned from World War 1, a lot of them were still struggling to settle into life back in Australian away from the war. Many of them were not fit to work and they often roamed the streets drunk, causing violence, as they tried to block out memories of the war.
The newspaper article was published in The Argus, on the 20th of May, 1922. It was about Bundoora convalescent farm, which was a farm where returned soldiers when to try and get them back to working condition. It was written from the perspective of a reporter, who described how they saw the returned soldiers, and what they thought the war had done to the mental and physical state of the soldiers.
The article illustrates to its audience what the returning soldiers were like and how Bundoora convalescent farm was helping them settle back into civilisation. It is a primary source, meaning it was from the time of the event. This means that it was most likely a true perspective of what the writer saw when they were looking at the returned soldiers. It is quite a useful source because it gives an honest perspective of how the soldiers were coping when they returned to Australia.
This source is reliable because it is an actual newspaper article from The State Library of Victoria’s Newspaper Collection. It is on a government site and it is also a primary source. All of these factors together make this source a very reliable source.
Three years after the Australian soldiers returned from World War 1, a lot of them were still struggling to settle into life back in Australian away from the war. Many of them were not fit to work and they often roamed the streets drunk, causing violence, as they tried to block out memories of the war.
The newspaper article was published in The Argus, on the 20th of May, 1922. It was about Bundoora convalescent farm, which was a farm where returned soldiers when to try and get them back to working condition. It was written from the perspective of a reporter, who described how they saw the returned soldiers, and what they thought the war had done to the mental and physical state of the soldiers.
The article illustrates to its audience what the returning soldiers were like and how Bundoora convalescent farm was helping them settle back into civilisation. It is a primary source, meaning it was from the time of the event. This means that it was most likely a true perspective of what the writer saw when they were looking at the returned soldiers. It is quite a useful source because it gives an honest perspective of how the soldiers were coping when they returned to Australia.
This source is reliable because it is an actual newspaper article from The State Library of Victoria’s Newspaper Collection. It is on a government site and it is also a primary source. All of these factors together make this source a very reliable source.
Source 2 - http://www.livingmemorials.com.au/when-the-boys-came-home/
This website is about the health impacts on the soldiers due to their time at war in WW1. It outlines the different types of health conditions and some of the effects of these on the soldiers when they returned to Australia.
The article is a secondary source as it was written almost 100 years after WW1. It is written in a factual tone that does not support either side of the war, it just outlines the health condition of the soldiers when they returned to Australia.
This website was very useful to learn about the health conditions of the returning soldiers and the effect this had on the rest of their lives and the people around them. It was very useful because it was specialised to just one way that the soldiers were affected when they got back from the war.
The site is an Australian site about an Anzac memorial so it is fairly reliable, but it is not as reliable as some other sources. This is also because it is secondary source, which means that the writer was not present at the time and had to get the information from another source.
This website is about the health impacts on the soldiers due to their time at war in WW1. It outlines the different types of health conditions and some of the effects of these on the soldiers when they returned to Australia.
The article is a secondary source as it was written almost 100 years after WW1. It is written in a factual tone that does not support either side of the war, it just outlines the health condition of the soldiers when they returned to Australia.
This website was very useful to learn about the health conditions of the returning soldiers and the effect this had on the rest of their lives and the people around them. It was very useful because it was specialised to just one way that the soldiers were affected when they got back from the war.
The site is an Australian site about an Anzac memorial so it is fairly reliable, but it is not as reliable as some other sources. This is also because it is secondary source, which means that the writer was not present at the time and had to get the information from another source.